| Viewing Single Post From: Hollie vs Sentenal | |
|---|---|
| +Hollie | May 17 2007, 05:04 PM |
|
Resident Brit
![]()
|
Why the fuck am I going first? Ah well. I'll make the best of it. So, this is Mia vs. Tauroneo, or Bismark or whatever you want to call him. All I can say is that, if you were fapping off Lethe in your previous debates, then Mia must seem like a goddess to you or something. Moving on. In this game, enemies are really durable due to existing Spd and Luk stats and high HP/Def combos in a lot of cases. Paladins in the endgame - about 40 HP and 20 Def. Is it more important to kill these enemies, or to tank them? In FE9, pretty much all your characters (the exceptions being like, Soren when he's unsupported, or Rhys or something) are durable. Some are more durable than others, but off the top of my head I can't think of a single melee unit who would struggle to survive against the enemy. So, then, if everyone can survive, you may as well just pick the units you like, right? Sorry, wrong. These enemy units are pretty durable, remember? So, if most units available to you can survive against the enemy, the deciding factor must be their offence. Mia > Tauroneo in offence. Tharfore, Mia should be picked over Tauronero. I don't really need to argue this, do I? Mia has lower Str, but much better Skl and her Spd means she'll be doubling everything but Ashnard, basically (I can't actually remember if she does double Ashnard, but it's irrelevent since neither can kill him anyways). Tauro has higher strength and access to a wide variety of weaponry, but he only doubles Generals and the like. Mia has better offence. Offence is more needed. Mia is more needed. That'll do for a first post. |
Known as Haar on Brand of Flame. Bitch. ![]() Formerly Margaret Thatcher, Aleksandr | |
![]() |
|
| Hollie vs Sentenal · Debates | |





1:50 PM Nov 27






