| Viewing Single Post From: Sentenal vs Kamaitachi | |
|---|---|
| Sentenal | Jul 29 2007, 10:28 PM |
|
When you can't make them see the light, make them feel the heat.
![]()
|
Okay... She has 37.2 base avoid when you get her. Pathetic, seeing as your generic Steel Lance Cavalier of the time have 80 accuracy, then WTA, so would have 52.8 hit on her. And OHKOs her.
Funny thing, you bringing up magic users. Douglas has a base of 46 HP, and 5 RES. Cath at 20/- has 30.7 HP and 5.2 RES. Douglas is very very durable, and immortal compared to "I'm too weak to level" Cath.
Nomads: 18 Atk Nomad Troopers: 21 Atk Myrmidons: 20 Atk after WTD Swordmasters: 22 Atk after WTD By chapter 18, if used, Douglas would be like 20/10ish. 20.6 DEF. So, nomads can double Douglas all day. Nomad troopers can double Douglas all day. Myrmidons can double Douglas all day. Swordmasters can double him all day. Wyverns are really the only enemy that can harm Douglas. So, tell me how the VAST majority of units in Sacae clinking Douglas is bullshit, allowing him to safely walk Roy to the throne with little to no danger to himself?
Level her up? How? She has a 50% chance of getting killed everytime she enters combat. And supports? Who?
Why waste time babying Cath like that when I can just have Chad and Astol run off to do it themselves?
Astol comes with the best bases of all the thieves, and decent in combat on the level you get him. Thieves aren't ment to have buff defenses. Yeah, but having defenses sure helps. You point out Astol's low SPD growth, yet don't point out his 15 SPD base. And his growth is a solid 50%. Astol and Chad both would probably be 20/- by the time you recruit Cath. So lets do some comparisions: 20/- Astol: HP: 34 STR: 10.5 SKL: 12 SPD: 19.4 DEF: 9 RES: 5 LUK: 12.5 5/- Cath: HP: 18.7 STR: 3.3 SKL: 9.7 SPD: 13.4 DEF: 2.3 RES: 2.2 LUK: 10.4 Astol can survive. Cath cannot. Astol looks to be like a pretty solid thief, with decent avoid, and plenty buff enough to survive being attacked. Unlike another little girl who you have to talk to 3 times to recruit.
A History fight, eh? The Allied Forces had MANY more tanks than the Axis did in WW2. In induvisual battles, sure, the Germans had more than the Brits in Africa. However, look at the Eastern Front. Battle of Kursk, for example, 3600 Russian tanks against the German's 2700 tanks. And guess who won? WW2 was practically won on the Eastern Front, and the Commi bastards sure proved why having more tanks is win. On a whole, the Allied forces had more Tanks than the Germans, and won the war. If the Soviet Union, a member of the Allied powers, had more tanks than the Germans alone, and them combined with American and British tanks, Allies had alot more tanks. Anyways, Axis forces were driven out of Africa due to Italians sucking, and getting Pincered. And you didn't address my point about rapable little girls. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Sentenal vs Kamaitachi · Debates | |




1:29 AM Nov 28






