Viewing Single Post From: A tier list up for discussion

Viewing Single Post From: A tier list up for discussion
Mekkah	Oct 24 2007, 01:24 PM
Posts: 667 Group: FEFFer Member #1,400 Joined: July 24, 2007	Being required early on isn't really a point in Rebecca's favor imo. If she wasn't required it would be a lot easier to go through chapters 12/13/13x since you wouldn't have to shield her. She's only decent against Peg knights on enemy phase, once. Lowen, Bartre and Hector manhandle Peg knights within one turn thanks to counterattacking, Rebecca cannot OHKO them. Dorcas can even OHKO the fuckers sometimes. Yeah, you can position her so that 1-2 rangers let her counterattack. The problem is, that requires absolutely no other 1-2 or 1 range enemies at that point or Rebecca will leave them alive and create a clog point or something. I could use something like Javelin/Hand Axe Kent and he :would: be countering. Plus against all the 1-range enemies in the game she still sucks on enemy phase. I like Rebecca but she's perfect in Mid. Her pro's are great, her cons are great as well, but neither side is great enough to warrant her in higher or lower.


A tier list up for discussion · Fire Emblem 6-8