| Viewing Single Post From: Morality | |
|---|---|
| +Reaver | Jan 1 2008, 05:53 PM |
|
Troll
![]()
|
But society would never change and thus would never make progress. If morals defined society, then society could never change the same flaws would exist forevermore. I don't care about a "father figure." The nuclear family is a sexist, outdated structure that needs modification. Does the father always need to work? Does the wife always need to have the same roles of cooking, cleaning, child care, and other roles previously associated with the wife? Does the father need to work, or can he stay home and care for the kids? Does the father need to be the disciplinary figure? Does the mother need to be subordinate to the father? When you refer to "father figure," you refer to the nuclear family structure and obsolete sexist ideas. I believe children should be brought up with loving parents. Two mothers? Fine. Two fathers? Fine. A working mother and stay-at-home dad? Fine. However, if this cannot happen because men will not take responsibility or circumstances prevent such from happening, I hope a mother's (or father's) love is enough to properly raise and influence a child. |
Favorite Staffer Summer 2008 -- Send me a Personal Message | |
![]() |
|
| Morality · Debate Forum | |





7:08 PM Nov 28






