Viewing Single Post From: Part I Tier List

Viewing Single Post From: Part I Tier List
Former Guest	Feb 23 2008, 08:47 PM
Posts: 88 Group: FEFFer Member #1,469 Joined: September 18, 2007	Quote: Units don't have to be h4x enough to get into 4-E to be a good unit overall. That's nice. He's still easily making it in over Volug or Ranulf or Mordecai or some laguz like that who isn't getting used anymore. Etc. Quote: Oh, and MJEmirzian also says Eddie is good, ranks Kieran, Marcia, and Boyd highly, and all laguz are bad barring the herons and royals. I wouldn't take everything he says seriously. Yawn. Edward isn't brilliant, but Zihark with an inflated level lead of about 8 come Act III isn't scaling offensive heights any greater than him by marginal at best, and still nowhere even close to where the swordmasters from FE4-7 have either, so eh to where ever it is you frequent that must fanboyishly slobber over him, I'm guessing. He's not good enough to be studiously considered or anything for penultimate maps in Act IV over Kieran, Marcia, Boyd or Eddie as far as I'm concerned, and he's not going into the final. A lot of the laguz outside the royals and herons are still worse than those four beorc. So if I agree with him on a few points here and there, I'm stargazing him word for word now? Don't be absurd. Quote: And lol @ the only healer in part 1 being "sucky". Meh. Take it up with Inui if you won't listen to me, then. Laura sucks, and isn't worth using over a single one of the archsages, Mist, Elincia or Micaiah.


Part I Tier List · Fire Emblem 9-11