Viewing Single Post From: FETO Discussion

Viewing Single Post From: FETO Discussion
Paperblade	May 12 2008, 09:13 PM
Posts: 76 Group: FEFFer Member #1,424 Joined: August 10, 2007	Mekkah May 12 2008, 08:18 PM Quote: Because, every game has to have balance. Mrite? Luck never plays a factor in games. Certainly not in say Fire Emblem where you could Critical or miss, where you could get a 0 levelup or a full levelup. So because it's there already, we should add more RNG based factors? More the opposite. I would rather minimize luck here. I agree completely. If you want to see what happens when a game has too much RNG reliance, Google Battle of Wesnoth. We're not talking FE5 style RNG, we're talking, 1RN and the highest hit rating you will ever likely see is 70%, and most of the time it's closer to 50%. The game has a huge luck factor in that even WITH a superior strategy, you can still lose because the RNG screws you in the ass. http://www.wesnoth.org/forum/viewtopic.php...t&sd=a&start=90 You can read the entire topic if you'd like, but I highly recommend just start reading when Cainen starts posting, because that's when it becomes More luck vs. Less luck. And yes, Cainen's luck IS that bad, and Wesnoth's RNG is that BS. I can't beat the campaigns without massive save state abuse, it makes FE5 look like a walk in the park by comparison simply because of that blasted RNG. Edit: And not to drive us too offtopic here. . . My guys are around Levels 2-3 (I have a few Level 1s and 1 Level 4), if anyone wants to fight. >_>


FETO Discussion · Fire Emblem 1-5