| Viewing Single Post From: Voting Thread | |
|---|---|
| Mekkah | Jun 17 2008, 06:48 AM |
![]()
|
From what I know, it was a bit like this. I emphasized how Seth takes more EXP from the team than Moulder. Therefore, when given a choice between using Seth and Moulder, on this aspect, Moulder > Seth. Moulder being there > Seth being there. The same sentence can also be seen as: Seth not being there > Moulder not being there. Inui translated this to something like "it's not about who helps more by disapoofing". Which indeed it was not about. There was a negative for using Seth that there was not for fielding Moulder. Dunno if that clarifies anything. |
![]() |
|
| Voting Thread · Debate Challenges | |





10:28 PM Nov 27






