|
Viewing Single Post From: Morality
|
|
Masaki
|
Nov 15 2008, 11:51 PM
|
- Posts:
- 71
- Group:
- FEFFer
- Member
- #1,986
- Joined:
- July 10, 2008
|
Reaver, you can't start a debate about Morals then focus only on the exceptions. There's a reason they're called "exceptions'. Morals are very integral towards society. As mentioned before, they are almost the original laws. However, as far as morals being subjective towards objective depends on the moral. We've already said Killing and Stealing are no-brainers. Premarital Sex? Gay Marriage? As of now, its up to the individual. We don't have laws that ban the full practice of the aforementioned acts yet, however should they be objective? I'll say no because I see no benefit. As far as your argument with Single-Parent homes, its ridiculous. You're basically saying that the single parent environment is irrelevant to a child's mental (and physical) being. If you ask any of those friends you know if they would want to raise their kids as a single parent or would want any other child to be raised in a single parental home, I can grantee that they would say no. The fact is the child's well being is more at risk in a single parent home than a traditional home and numerous studies have proved that.
|
|
2:32 AM Nov 28
