Viewing Single Post From: Are They Allowed To Do This?

Viewing Single Post From: Are They Allowed To Do This?
etimms	May 31 2007, 01:45 PM
Posts: 4 Group: Members Member #858 Joined: January 3, 2007	guys I have been following this forum for a while and recently went to court against DAF. Basically last year we terminated our agreement with Yes car and returned the car. We heard nothing from them until we got a letter from the court telling us Yes car were filing a CCJ against us. Long story cut short we defended ourselves in court were the judge stuck it out for the time been cause they had not filed the correct particulars of claim (basically they were trying to say we had defaulted etc when we hadnt) The judge told Golds representative (who was clueless and i think he had only had the case given to yhim a few days before) that they had until the 24th of June to file new particulars of claim or claim was to be struck out. When they did file they we were to defend it again. We were to pay them no cost to date. Well today we recieved a letter from a new solictiors who have taken over from Golds offering us a reduced settlement ie they want us to pay them Ł900 instead of the Ł1500. Now my thought is that this is breaking the terms that the judge has ordered and I wonder if anyone can advise. Hubby and I are happy to go to court again as we fully believe like lots of people here we were mis sold the insurances on 2 reason. 1 my husband didnt have a permenant job so therefore wouldnt be cover (we can prove this) and we like everyone else were told we had to have the insurances. We have never recieved any paperwork reguarding these insurances. The judge also told us that if they did file we should defend when or if they did refile and was telling us to look up things about recent rulings from (sorry if I get it wrong) OFT and FSA. Wonder what your thoughts are. I hope this makes sense Many thanks


Are They Allowed To Do This? · YES CAR CREDIT FORUM