| Viewing Single Post From: The Great Ban/Errata Divide | |
|---|---|
| captainspud | Jun 9 2009, 01:58 AM |
Senior Member
  ![]](http://209.85.48.22/static/1/pip_r.png)
|
With the advent of fan-created sets, I think we'll likely see the advent of a seventh class of erratum: #7: Huh, wow. That's an excellent point. Simple fact: fan designers don't have UDE's experience, nor UDE's playtesters. Our sets are going to be weaker overall, and we ARE going to miss things. Unlike UDE, who had to maintain an air of professionalism, fan designers should be encouraged to take feedback about cards whose true working they didn't understand, and issue a set of "My bad!" erratas, even if they fundamentally alter the way the card works. We're never going to put out perfect sets, and it's important to keep in mind that UDE's "If it's a mistake, we just have to ban it" policy isn't mandatory for us. We can be forgiven for issuing corrections to cards we just didn't have the expertise to know would be a problem. |
 |
|
| The Great Ban/Errata Divide · Vs. System General Discussion | |
3:35 AM Nov 29
